--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, ruthsimplicity <no_re...@...> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Richard J. Williams" > <willytex@> wrote: > > > > So, it's all about Jim. > > > > I like Jim. Enlightened Dawn, if you are Jim,
The biggest tell for me is the use of the term "THE Maharishi" by a person who is an insider enough to want to defend attacks on him. It is a deceptive affectation that is incongruent for the level of TM involvement. You can disguise writing style but it is more difficult to mask POV. Although I have had good interactions with Jim as well, I prefer a more upfront interaction with people here. Any squirrelly factor tends to detract from the communication for me. Most of the people who use other screen names that I interact with here have connected with me through email, so I know I am dealing with a real person. I appreciate that. We are dealing with very personal topics here so for me, anything that helps me understand who I am communicating with helps me focus my writing. Whether ED is really Jim or not the poster is spending some editing attention to make sure we know very little about them personally. A technique that is much more effective without a long history of interaction. But hey, I could be wrong, I often am! I am glad you came > back. I couldn't stay away either. > > Be cool. Keep in mind what Kirk said try not to bait or be baited. I > am going to give it a shot myself. :) >
