grate.swan wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <jst...@...> wrote:
>
>> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, grate.swan <no_reply@> wrote:
>>
>>> Just curious.
>>>
>>> So people who are not uptight about naked bodies,
>>> or depictions of sexual union, tended more to vote
>>> for McCain. And those who are uptight about naked
>>> bodies and depictions of sexual union voted for
>>> Obama.
>>>
>> Or, those who have actual satisfying sex lives don't
>> find fantasy depictions of the sex lives of others
>> all that compelling compared to their own real ones.
>>
>>
>
> Upon refelection, perhaps its those states with the highest percentage
> of teenage boys per capita. Implying large famililes relative to the
> norm. Republican states perhaps bear that our. Utah for sure.
>
> However, I am trouble by trying to fit the David Duchovny data point
> into your hypothesis. Copious sex with Tea Leoni, unsatisfying? Hard
> to fathom.
As I have pointed out before the religious right is in a dither about
Eric Holder being made AG because they fear like the Clinton
administration he will de-emphasize going after pornography. Good
idea, why waste taxpayer money on such witch hunts? And I also hope
that this will reverse the prudish trend in our media which BTW Fox has
been trying to get the FCC to drop because they want to compete more
with cable networks in the evening.
