--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <jst...@...> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, grate.swan <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > Just curious. > > > > So people who are not uptight about naked bodies, > > or depictions of sexual union, tended more to vote > > for McCain. And those who are uptight about naked > > bodies and depictions of sexual union voted for > > Obama. > > Or, those who have actual satisfying sex lives don't > find fantasy depictions of the sex lives of others > all that compelling compared to their own real ones.
I don't know if anyone is ever sexually satisfied, maybe satiated temporarily. It seems to me that a person who thinks this way is dependent for continuous sex to have what is called a 'satisfying sex life', as one experience will never do. Hence it's called a 'life' that is, an ongoing affair, as if another person could satisfy your need for love. It kind of presumes that one 'needs' sex to be happy, well, that's the brainwashing of the day. When will you break free of the spell you're under and realize you don't need sex to be happy....you need God.
