Raunchy dog, When you said "anti" you said it all.
I'm sorry about your puzzlement. You seem to believe these people might somehow understand if they just stepped back a moment. Your view is honest and unprejudiced but one that is still hopeful about understanding their antipathy. I'm afraid there is nothing to understand. People can be angry about how they were mistreated by the TMO. That is understandable but is also attributable to the human defilements underpinning spiritual organizations. If you think this was bad you've likely never heard how the Hare Krishnas misbehaved or how Trungpa's organization became a field of lust for teachers leaching on young meditating women. On the other hand, believing that TM anti's are capable of objectivity is a kind misunderstanding on your part. Thank you for your kindness but it is no longer warranted. Antis like Turq and Vaj are incapable of objectivity about Maharishi or TM. They demonstrate such incapacity on this forum every day. The reality is that they feed like vampires upon their interactions with people on this forum. Once FFL member decide that there is nothing to know from them and that defending against their vomit by cleaning it is not warranted then their ability to function here will ceaqse. That is all there is to know. Sorry but there is nothing else. These people are addicted to what others think of them and negative responses just prove to them that they are recognized. There is nothing else to know about them. All sentimental considerations about them are just an indulgent weakness. Once people stop responding to their posts, no matter how suplicative, outlandish or unwarranted, then the well of their secret pleasure will dry up. And that indeed is all there is to know. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "raunchydog" <raunchy...@...> wrote: > > Do you have any insight into why saying something positive about TM like, "I love TM for it's simplicity," would drive anti-TMers crazy? >
