--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com <mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com> , Vaj <vajradh...@...> wrote: > > > On Mar 5, 2009, at 6:41 PM, off_world_beings wrote: > Let's see you answer the questions this time Vaj: > > > Get over it Off World, this is the last post I'll waste on this.I > think FF at this time would have limited appeal to someone who wasn't > into very seriously into TM/TMSP already. And certainly, if what I > understand is true, that one must learn the advanced techniques > before one can do the TM-sidhi program, it's not worth the 20,000+ > dollars it would cost.>
It costs nothing to learn TM. You just do work study. Same for the Sidhis. It is NOT $20,000 to learn the sidhis. You are lying. Any meditator or sidha can easily do fine at MUM with the best food and shelter, and even get paid to meditate, last I heard. However, in Boulder, you will likely end up working in a gas station, and paying $20,000 in tuition, with very little opportunity for room and board work-study as there is in MUM. I would be very wary of moving to Boulder in these economic times without some serious back-up money or a very stable and good job there. The cost of living there is probably 4 times as high as it is in FF. > > I've been to both FF and Boulder and I've enjoyed both areas> So you frelly admit you have never attended MUM on staff or student, and have never been to Narupa. <<in fact > at one time I thought it would be ideal to move to FF. But as I've > matured, that opinion has changed. It's also less appealing > geographically to me, as I like a more hilly or mountainous area>> I agree, but the support system at Narupa will be NOTHING like as good as Farifield, and not everyone wants mountains. And the mountains in Boulder are a couple of hours drive for any good ones. And if you are forced to work in a gas station anyway, which you will, unless you have very good standing already, then you will never get to the mountains. < and > one with more accessibility to culture. I also don't appreciate the > "one way or the highway" approach of the TM org. >> The main point touted by TMO is that it should be extensively sieintifically verified. So once again you show you are anti-science. Now you will give monologue on how it is not science, but the fact is, that it is published science. Fact. You cannot get around it. NIH, judges in Missouri, public schools are all working with TM now. Nothing else is even close, because people only want what is scientifically verified. Only a few people on the frings, like you Vaj, are against scientific published results and you want to go back to the dark ages. Two more studies on TM coming out soon. That adds to the 200 or so already. You argument is useless. Science will win over ignorance. < I > also would demand a certain level of transparency and ethical > standards from any org I'd be associated with. Knowing what I know> Such as? You make things up Vaj. OffWorld
