--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <no_re...@...> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Robert <babajii_99@> wrote:
> >
> > http://www.cafeastrology.com/compatibilityrating.html
> 
> Just for fun, I entered two sets of birth data.
> Their rating:
> 
> 0.0 / 20
> Perhaps it could be better to reconsider your
> relation, which is unlikely to last, and the
> bad moments can eventually predominate over
> the good ones as time goes by. Enjoy the present
> without planning too much and if it really
> requires too much energy to adapt to each other,
> then don't bother yourself too much. You will
> need courage to make a long way together. This
> is very unlikely to be a successful relationship
> but that's not an absolute fatality. It is up
> to you to decide without dramatizing!
> 
> Why this is funny is that the two birthdates
> were for myself and the person I have been
> closest to and have had the strongest and
> most mutually-beneficial relationship of
> my life with, for almost 20 years now.
> 
> So much for astrology...
>
That's funny, because the only person that had a low score like that;
Was my ex-brother-in-law, which expained to me, how sour our relationship had 
always been.
Then I checked the the rating for him and my ex, and it came out a 20. 
So, that explained a lot to me, and how it played into the sibling rivalry 
thing, when I was younger.
So, it is fun for me, in that way.

I admire that you could be close to someone, for so many years, when the stars 
wouldn't have predicted it.
But, then again, you are certainly, not the ordinary kind of chap, so I would 
expect some kind of anomolies, wouldn't you??/!
R.G.

Reply via email to