--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Louis McKenzie <ltm...@...> wrote: > > > > --- On Fri, 4/24/09, do.rflex <do.rf...@...> wrote: > > > From: do.rflex <do.rf...@...> > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Brazil Law and Brazil Love > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > Date: Friday, April 24, 2009, 12:06 AM > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Louis McKenzie <ltm457@> wrote: > > > > I dont know who you are that says you live in Brasil. However you just > > speak and obviously do not know. In Brasil most recently when they > > stopped the tax on banking accounts. They came up with a new rule. In > > the past if you own a company you could file your company tax info and the > > personal would be covered in the company info. Now they will not accept > > this and if you do not file personal tax reports they can block your cpf > > and give a fine. The new part was the fine. > > > > BRAZIL LAW REGARDING CUSTODY... In the majority of the cases 9 out of 10 > > the children stay with the mother. Even if the mother is involved in > > prostitution whic is legal in Brazil, in anything that does not present > > physical harm to the child. Brazil law for children is based on ECA > > estatuto criança e adolescentes which is past dated and is basically > > irrelevant to 2009 world law. > > > > > ECA = best for children to be with family= if father rapes daughter the > > daughter should taken from the home and the family rehabilitated then > > returned to the home. > > > > When it comes to family and anything people oriented Brasil is behind the > > times. > > > This is what my Brazilian wife who specializes in Brazilian family law has > written in response: > > > You said: "In the past if you own a company you could file your company tax > info and the personal would be covered in the company info." > > Best stated my accountants took care of these things so I did not. As an > american with a company in Brazil and without permanent visa I declared > exemption but could not declare exemption after 2004 but my accountants did > the filings. > > In 2007 I believe the tax I am referring to is called cmpf a tax of 1% > charged on movement of funds in banking accounts. Before they took this tax > away you had to go to RF pay a fine of 4.50 R$ and then they would regulariza > your cpf and there was no problem. In 2007 they not only charged the 4.50 > but they also charged a fine to business owners who did not declare personal > income of 160 Reais per year. The point is that we could not receive money > in our names. > > That statement is not true. You always had to and still do have to file two > income tax reports, one for the company and your own personal one because > they are different entities, the company [pessoa juridica] and you [pessoa > fisica]. > > I think the key word here is multa. > > The company has to declare its accounts and you have to declare your own > personal financial earnings that you got from the company. The company has a > tax number and you have a CPF. Those are two different numbers and require > two separate filings. > > > You said: "BRAZIL LAW REGARDING CUSTODY... In the majority of the cases 9 out > of 10 the children stay with the mother." > > Again, not true. The Brazilian law of custody is ruled by the Civil Code. The > principal rule says the judge has to decide these > kinds of issues in the best interests of the children. > > One is theoretical and the other is practical. I am speaking of the what > happens not what is in theory. I have conversed with various lawyers here > and all have said the same as I have stated. If you think you can make > positive strides in changing the practice in Sorocaba family law then PLEASE > I am open to hear you perspective. I believe there should be room for > change. > > Fathers can keep the children if they prove the mother is immoral in front of > the child or anything that can jeopardize the welfare of the child. > Well imagine that you understand theory but practice may be totally different. > Also what is considered jeopardy may be totally different depending on the > judge.. > From my point of view being near his grandmother might be considered > jeopardy, but tell that to a judge. I may believe forcing an american child > to live in Brasil is incorrect but that is my viewpoint... > > Brazilian law also allows the mother and the father to have dual custody of > the child or single custody with visitation rights. > Well here you are also correct but what I have as a problem is that my income > has been blocked, so without conditions they say they will not do....Even > though I can show more than 500K Reais spent in taking care of my family from > 2004 to 2008..... > > You said: "Even if the mother is involved in prostitution which is legal in > Brazil, in anything that does not present physical harm to the child." > > Prostitution is NOT legal in Brazil. > Theory and Practice...Prostitution is a very large industry in Brasil. A > large portion of Brazilian tourism is based on Prostitution. They do not > arrest a woman for prostitution in Brasil. They may arrest someone who is > pimping but rarely do they arrest a woman for prostituion. I thought is was > illegal but I have been informed that it is legal. > > You said: "Brazil law for children is based on ECA estatuto criança e > adolescentes which is past dated and is basically irrelevant to 2009 world > law. > One of the people who crested ECA was a man named Dr. Paulo Frota a personal > friend from Belem do Para. Dr. Frota is dead now but in the 60´s I believe > he worked on ECA.. ECA DOES NOT PROTECT IT IS AGAIN THEORY MORE SPECIFICLY > OUTDATED THEORY > Again false. ECA is a general law of protection of kids and teenagers under > risky situations. ECA is written as law to protect children from any risk. > It's fully current in its application and is considered a model for > protection for a wide range anyone vulnerable to abuse including the elderly > or infirmed [idosos]. THEORY VS PRACTICE ECA AGAIN DOES NOT PROTECT IT IS > PAPERWORK. YOU HAVE A LAW ALL CHILDREN MUST ATTEND SCHOOL. WELL WHY IS IT > THAT A MAJORITY OF BRAZILIAN YOUTH ARE LACKING EDUCATION???? > A BRAZILIAN MAN WAS JUST CONVICTED OF ABUSING HIS DAUGHTER IN THE US. IN > BRAZIL IT HAPPENS A LOT. MOST CASES GO UN REPORTED BECAUSE OF SHAME. > HOWEVER ECA IS SUPPOSED TO PROTECT THE CHILD IN CASES OF ABUSE BUT ECA STATES > THAT IN ALL CASES THE IDEAL IS TO RETURN THE CHILD TO THE FAMILY.... > > > This guy is faking this all or he is totally fueled by his lack of > information. > > The fines of the Receita Federal [Brazilian IRS] occur when you don't declare > your personal income which has always been a requirement, or if you > intentionally file false tax information, which is a crime. You loose your > CPF when you fail to follow the rules. > > YOU KNOW vERY LITTLE ABOUT ACTUALITIES OF BRASIL..... YOU KNOW THEORY..... > As we say in Brasil, 'He hears the bell but doesn't have a clue where the > church is'. > > What can you expect from a person dumb enough to marry a prostitute and who > fears witchcraft spells of an uneducated old lady. > THE IDEA OF AS YOU SAY WITCHCRAFT THEN YOU MUST NOT BELIEVE IN AYURVEDA OR > JYOTISH OR EVEN MOSES..... SORRY BUT IF YOU ARE FROM BRAZIL AND HAVE MARRIED > AN AMERICAN HOW DO WE KNOW YOUR HISTORY? MONEY RULES IN BRAZIL AND SORRY TO > SAY PEOPLE WILL DO ANYTHING TO GET IT. BY THE WAY I NEVER MARRIED A > PROSTITUTE I LIVED WITH A WOMAN WHO HAD BEEN A PROSTITUTE IN THE PAST BUT > CHOSE NOT TO LET ME KNOW THAT FACT UNTIL AFTER SHE WAS PREGNANT..... > Good screenplay for a Mexican soap opera. > > You are very Brazilian in the fact that you have nothing constructive to > contribute... > Bye
And now you show yourself to be a hostile bigot? It's not at all difficult to see why you're such a loser, Mr McKenzie. Maybe you should begin look at yourself and your behavior to understand WHY you're such a loser - instead of trying to blame everyone else for your miseries.
