--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley" <j_alexander_stan...@...> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Duveyoung <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > Alex/Rick, > > > > You guys still have not addressed the issue of "stalking." > > I haven't because IMO, it's just another case of you going off on a tangent. > The issue here is whether or not message headers are public information. In > fact, they ARE public information. End of story. If a case of actual stalking > happens in the context of FFL, and not some bogus accusation of stalking, > like the one made against Judy, I may be inclined to address that issue.
Alex, So instead of addressing the issue, you're calling it a tangent and that's how you're going to debate? Isn't this a case of FFL needing to examine its "stalking policy" and to definitively handle it? And, so what's so fucking wrong with going off on a tangent? Show me a thread here that doesn't evolve into other issues and nuances. Can I ask you to examine your feelings towards me in the above regard? Am I wrong that "reading between the lines" of your replies it can be surmised that you see me as some sort of "time-wasting twit of little brain who's making mountains out of molehills all the time?" Like that? Is that your bottom line? I attacked your use of public information and I think it stung ya -- man up and handle the issue. Edg
