Alex, I don't get posts via email, so I don't know what Shemp posted, but what about my piece a couple weeks ago in which I wrote up a "hot session" as my "satirically" gratuitous interpretation of someone's post of scriptural love-poetry?
I may not have peppered that piece with the accouterments that usually adorn porn, but I felt the piece was pretty damned sexually explicit. Why didn't you smack me for it? And, what if I HAD porned up the piece? How far can one go before one is "in trouble with Yahoo and risking being categorized as 'adult' in nature?" Do you have such fine point clarity? Or, are you erring on the safe side and keeping things here tamped down well below the Yahoo moralists' tipping points? Is merely one sentence enough, or does it take quite a few to amount to a Yahoo infraction? If I posted, say, a solid paragraph that was like the second example below, would you call me on that? 1. "I slid my incandescent pole into her lube-spritzing pink cave" seems acceptable to you. 2. "I slammed my tumescent throbbing cock's purple head into her juicy cunt" seems obviously pornographic to you. Is it "mere vocabulary?" I doubt it. I think you're on the run from the Yahoo moralists and pandering to their fundamentalism. Fuck 'em. Er, make that fuck 'em up the ass with a lube glazed monster schlong pulsating with a "gotta fuck it hard, fuck it now, fuck it until I come," urgency that floods my brain. Why should I care if FFL is dumped into an not-easily-found-by-the-search-engine category? Are we all, er, recruiting new members by masking our truly deep "rutting instincts?" If I quote a hefty paragraph from, say, Lady Chatterley's Lover, would Yahoo be triggered? I'm remembering one bit in that book where the guy's nine inch long, three inches across cock is thoroughly worshiped. So what if some pissant here posts some crappola that gets FFL in trouble. If anyone here is for openness, it's you, Alex. So what if FFL is in a search-back-waters? What agenda are you adhering to if you're invested in such a powerful handcuffing of the freedoms virtually every poster here thinks is their birthright? Being afraid of Yahoo, who the fuck here wants that? Edg --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley" <j_alexander_stan...@...> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <shempmcgurk@> wrote: > [snip] > > Posting sexually explicit content is against the rules, and it's probably the > most strictly enforced rule we have. I'm going to delete that post. Please > refrain from posting that kind of material in the future. >
