--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <no_re...@...> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Richard M" <compost1uk@> wrote:
> >
> > Let's call the Turq docrine about opinion "TD". 
> > 
> > TD seems to be something like "Truth is relative to your 
> > point of view and there is no Truth (capital 'T')".
> 
> Not at all. You are making the same reading error
> that the rest here are. I stated my position very
> clearly: I don't *think* that there is any such 
> thing as "absolute truth." But I am willing to be 
> convinced otherwise. All you have to do is produce
> one. Just one.
> 
  Would that mean that an observeable fact might not always be true?
  For example-  we live for varying numbers of years and, then we don't.
  Has anyone seen it differently?
>


Reply via email to