Hey that's great, Rick. Thanks for posting good news about women's issues. I 
always liked Carter for his commitment to public service, especially his work 
with Habitat for Humanity. His willingness to stand on principle, even this 
late in life, shows he is a man of integrity. It's amazing, how religion, the 
supposed fountain of love and kindness, breeds such bigotry and hatred toward 
gays, people of color and women. 

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Rick Archer" <r...@...> wrote:
>
> 
> Jimmy Carter Leaves Church Over Treatment of Women
> 7/20/09
> After more than 60 years together, Jimmy Carter has announced himself at
> odds with the Southern Baptist Church -- and he's decided it's time they go
> their separate ways. Via Feministing
> <http://www.feministing.com/archives/016792.html>
> <http://www.feministing.com/archives/016792.html> , the former president
> called the decision "unavoidable" after church leaders prohibited women from
> being ordained and insisted women be "subservient to their husbands." Said
> Carter in an essay in The Age
> <http://www.theage.com.au/opinion/losing-my-religion-for-equality-20090714-d
> k0v.html?page=-1>
> <http://www.theage.com.au/opinion/losing-my-religion-for-equality-20090714-d
> k0v.html?page=-1> :
> At its most repugnant, the belief that women must be subjugated to  the
> wishes of men excuses slavery, violence, forced prostitution, genital
> mutilation and national laws that omit rape as a crime. But it also costs
> many  millions of girls and women control over their own bodies and lives,
> and  continues to deny them fair access to education, health, employment and
> influence within their own communities.
> 
> And, later:
> The truth is that male religious leaders have had -- and still  have -- an
> option to interpret holy teachings either to exalt or subjugate  women. They
> have, for their own selfish ends, overwhelmingly chosen the  latter. Their
> continuing choice provides the foundation or justification for  much of the
> pervasive persecution and abuse of women throughout the world.  
> After watching everyone from philandering politicians to Iran's president
> taking a sudden look heavenwards when the roof starts to come down on them,
> it's refreshing to see Carter calling out the role of religion in the
> mistreatment of women. 
> 
> The question for Carter -- and for others who find themselves at odds with
> leadership -- is, when a group you're deeply involved in starts to move away
> from your own core beliefs, do you stay and try to change from within or, at
> some point, do you have to look for the exit? Carter did give the former a
> shot -- in recent years publicly criticizing and distancing himself from
> church leadership, while staying involved with his church. Now, he's seeing
> if absence might do what presence did not.
>


Reply via email to