--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, scienceofabundance <no_re...@...> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > Sorry mate, that's not my experience. I've seen gays agressively > > getting on to hetero fellows on the tube, expecially young boys, > > to the effect that the police had to be summoned. > > > > Not that there is anything wrong with it... being gay. > > But they should stay the f... away from heteros not wanting > > their attention. > > I don't think you have the faintest idea how fabricated/conjured > your responses appear.
He really doesn't. Then again, our Nabby also believes that the people on this forum who criticize Maharishi and the TMO are being paid by the CIA to do so. :-) It's a self importance thang. Anyone who believes in something different than he does is doing it to spite him or attack him or "steal his energy" somehow. It's all about him. You see the same levels of self-important paranoia in TBs of "other stripes" as well. Raunchy and Judy are *still* trying to claim that someone suggesting that they are so angry that they are in danger of bursting into flames (the well-known phenomenon of "spontaneous human combustion") is a "death threat." Judy says *with a straight face* that the cop she accuses of "entrap- ment" lured the black professor out onto his porch *so that* he could arrest him. Cuckoo. Once it's become an established pattern of thinking, the paranoid see nothing *unusual* about their paranoia. They don't think twice about saying stuff like this. Other people, a bit more balanced, listen to what they say and start looking for the tin foil hat.
