--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <jst...@...> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "ShempMcGurk" <shempmcgurk@> wrote: > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote: > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "ShempMcGurk" <shempmcgurk@> wrote: > > > <snip> > > > > Again, why are you so eager to have > > > > catastrophic man-made global warming be real? > > > > > > > > Don't you hope that the deniers are right and > > > > you are wrong? > > > > > > > > Because that would mean that millions of people > > > > won't die! > > > > > > > > Isn't that a better outcome than if global > > > > warming were real? > > > > > > > > I simply don't understand why you aren't at > > > > least hoping against hope that the deniers are > > > > right. > > > > > > Shemp, ya know, hoping against hope that catastrophic > > > global warming (manmade or otherwise) isn't real is a > > > *given*. It's such an obvious given that it would be > > > silly even to mention it. > > > > If it is such a given then, certainly, you should be able > > to easily find me at least five or six examples from the > > internet, Judy, in which global warming alarmists greet > > news or suggestions of information contrary to their > > theory of death and doom as welcoming. > > Nope, wrong. Folks typically don't post about such > information until they've looked into it. You wouldn't > see them "welcoming" it unless they had found that it > held up. >
Oh, I see. It is an obvious "given" but yet you've never seen anyone mention it. Here we have people claiming that global warming will kill 10s of millions of people and it is a given, you claim, that if they are presented with the slightest suggestion that they are wrong on their claim that they would welcome it. Yet in all the billions of pages on the internet on one of the most discussed topics current in the world today, you can't find and have never seen one, single, teeny, tiny mention of it because it hasn't "held up". Well, if "holding up" is the standard, Judy, then I suggest that you adopt this standard for global warming alarmism itself because, Judy, virtually ZERO of the alarmists' claims are coming true! NONE of it has "held up". Thank you for your response, Judy. I think you've just strengthened my claim.
