--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings <no_re...@...> wrote: > > > It is interesting how Vaj and Turq sound like Shemp and Billy G on the > pollution problem, when they deny the overwhelming scientific evidence > on TM published in respected peer-reviewed journals. > > Unfortunately for BillyG, Pali, and Shemp, the scientific evidence is > overwhelmingly on the side of the evils of pollution. > > And unfortunately for Turq., and Vaj, the benefits of TM - all published > in respected peer-reviewed journals - is overwhelming. > > You may not like it Turq and Vaj, but to deny science puts you in the > same boat as the pollution debate losers, such as Shemp, Paliman, and > Billy G. > > Science wins for TM, and for climate studies. You cannot deny science no > matter how hard you try, leaving you sounding like an archaic > flat-earther. > > I am very happy to say that I am on the side of science on both these > topics. > > All those on the side of science say "Aye" > > OffWorld >
Om, and know my experience too. Thanks.
