& some climactic Shemp-canery chicanery evidently too. Climategate:
"bunch of emails shows that when scientists are communicating privately they can be as catty and nasty as anyone else. It's good gossip fodder, but nothing more." The climate-gate run through: http://www.motherjones.com/kevin-drum/2009/11/climategate > > > > > > It is interesting how Vaj and Turq sound like Shemp and Billy G on the > > pollution problem, when they deny the overwhelming scientific evidence > > on TM published in respected peer-reviewed journals. > > > > Unfortunately for BillyG, Pali, and Shemp, the scientific evidence is > > overwhelmingly on the side of the evils of pollution. > > > > And unfortunately for Turq., and Vaj, the benefits of TM - all published > > in respected peer-reviewed journals - is overwhelming. > > > > You may not like it Turq and Vaj, but to deny science puts you in the > > same boat as the pollution debate losers, such as Shemp, Paliman, and > > Billy G. > > > > Science wins for TM, and for climate studies. You cannot deny science no > > matter how hard you try, leaving you sounding like an archaic > > flat-earther. > > > > I am very happy to say that I am on the side of science on both these > > topics. > > > > All those on the side of science say "Aye" > > > > OffWorld > > > > Om, and know my experience too. Thanks. >
