--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "do.rflex" <do.rf...@...> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "do.rflex" <do.rflex@> wrote: > > > > > > ...this time from authors.nag, FFL's self-appointed nightmare > > > mother-in-law, operator of the -Nitpicker Zone- death trap. > > > > > > Message # 236474 > > > > The fascinating thing is that she found something > > to hate in the "Salsa Granny," too. > > > > Could it possibly be because Granny demonstrated > > more of an ability to enjoy life and have fun in > > three minutes on YouTube than Judy has displayed > > in sixteen-plus years on the Internet? > > I think she has her version of fun. She seems to take > sadistic pleasure in running her endless, nag act. > It's been described before...
<giggle> The do.rk is *so* proud of this piece of writing, this is the *third time* he's posted it. Count the ad hominems (and see if you can find anything *but* ad hominems--a prize if you can): > The -Nitpicker Zone- where a nit is worth so much more than > a thousand words - especially if it can be implemented in a > self-serving but pointless poisonous perpetually prolonged > petty personal pissing match Look! Alliteration! > for anyone who mistakenly chooses to continue to participate > in it as a hapless nitpickee. > > A bigger down side is that it accomplishes little-to-nothing > to advance any cause other than the personal ego of the > obsessive professional nitpicker extraordinaire. In fact it > offends and alienates even previously neutral observers Actually it tends to wake up previously neutral observers to the ignorance, arrogance, dishonesty, and hypocrisy of those at whom it's directed. (That is, if the neutral observers the kind of human beings who find those qualities repugnant.) > as no one who dares even comment is safe from being found > with real or imagined nits to have picked by the professional > nitpicker...in the -Nitpicker Zone-. And any critic, > present or past, can be sure to be persistently and > perpetually picked Oooh! More alliteration! > at for nits at any time. I'll leave the rest of this in so readers can once again be *dazzled* by the absolutely *brilliant* writing and penetrating psychological insight the do.rk has labored so long and hard to produce. The difference between me (and Raunchy) and the do.rk is that *ad hominem is all he's capable of*--that and copying and pasting. Yes, Raunchy and I make use of ad hominem, but *not as a substitute for thought*. Count the number of words I've posted that represent thoughtful reasoning and analysis--words I've written myself--vs. the number of same posted by the do.rk. > > ===== > > Judy lives the role of a mean spirited self-righteous > nitpicker of real and/or fabricated nits often using > twisted meanings, off-the-wall interpretations and > misrepresentations of others' motives and what they > have said (Of which, unfortunately, the do.rk will be unable to provide any examples.) > - in her pedantic, logorrheic Hey, a fifty-cent word! Wow, I'll be the do.rk is good at Scrabble. arguments personally against them and their positions together with both subtle and overt insults to bait them into perpetuating her sadistic game. > > By perpetually exercising her nastiness against her targets her real aim is > to maintain her self-satisfying [but false] self-image of superior > intellectual importance which she hopes to be noticed and enthusiastically > supported by those dumb enough [like I was at one time] to buy into it. She > takes particular delight in relentlessly pursuing anyone who dares criticize > her. > > She's run this ugly game in forums like this for ages instead of being a > positive contributing human being. You can plainly see she doesn't exactly > inspire much of anything but hostility. > > My advice is to stay away from her and leave her to her own energies. >
