--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "ShempMcGurk" <shempmcg...@...> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "do.rflex" <do.rflex@> wrote: > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "ShempMcGurk" <shempmcgurk@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "do.rflex" <do.rflex@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > [snip] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your views on Social Security as a "bad" thing are shared primarily by > > > > the right wing fringe minority. Oh wait! ...you DO belong to the right > > > > wing fringe minority! > > > > > > > > > [snip] > > > > > > > > > > > > Putting aside what I am or am not...and not relying on stereotypes, John, > > > what is it exactly about Social Security that you think is a GOOD thing? > > > > > > The trillion dollars a year that is paid out? > > > > > > The fact that people are FORCED to pay into it? > > > > > > That the contributions have INCREASED tenfold? > > > > > > That Social Security, as an annuity payment, is an insurance product and > > > that as such should be under state jurisdiction, NOT the federal > > > government? > > > > > > That it is a legal Ponzi Scheme in every sense of the word? > > > > > > Please, John, tell us what you like about it and why the federal > > > government should be doing it as opposed to, say, individuals or the > > > individual states? Why the federal government and why it is some sort of > > > model for healthcare insurance (again, an area that is supposed to be the > > > exclusive jurisdiction of the states)? > > > > > > > > > Your right wing fringe wingnut views on the value of Social Security to the > > American people are akin to your right wing fringe wingnut views on AGW. > > > > In your case your thinking is based on your inability to comprehend the > > concepts of "We the People," and "promote the general Welfare" as in > > government for the common good. > > > > It's a waste of time to even attempt a rational dialogue with loud, yet > > impotent, fringe minority handjob trolls like you who live in the alternate > > reality of Wingnut World. > > > > > But John you never -- and I mean NEVER -- ever make your own arguments for > the points of view you hold. All you ever do is reproduce articles from > somewhere else on the web or call people names. > > Can't you actually think for yourself? String together a few points that > supports why you feel a certain way? Debate and counter what those who hold > different views to yours? >
Read this sentence again, Tony: "It's a waste of time to even attempt a rational dialogue with loud, yet impotent, fringe minority handjob trolls like you who live in the alternate reality of Wingnut World."
