--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "metoostill" <metoost...@...> wrote:
> If it turns out to be true, I would say it is 50/50 at best that MMY ever > knew about it at all. Nice plot twist! Wicked. The fact that Hegelin is claiming surprise gives some credence to the theory that Maharishi might not have known. How could you hide this from the other rajas? And how little these rajas seem to know about their supreme leader! You would think the Lebanese movement would know if he has his family stashed back home. The idea of hiding a legitimate family is soooo fey. It turns the world of scandals on its head! And why leak it this way rather than announce it himself? My head is spinning with all the WTF implications. It's like having someone sidle up to you at a party and in a hushed whisper ask if you want to go out back and drink some soda with them. "Ooooh I've got some great Coke man." "Sorry but I don't do blow, thanks anyway." "No man Coca Cola with ice. After I drink a couple I'll confess to being happily married." "Excuse me I think I'll inhale the laughing gas out of the whipped cream cans while I process how weird this all is." > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues" > > <curtisdeltablues@> wrote: > > > > though, how that jibes with the necessity to keep the > > Royal Family secret is a puzzler. (And keeping the > > marriage itself secret, for two and a half years before > > the first kid was born, is even odder.) > > > > Wild guess: It wasn't MMY but Tony himself who wanted > > to keep the whole thing secret. MMY agreed on condition > > the secrecy last only until the first kid was in school; > > and he told Tony that when the time came to reveal it, > > he could blame the secrecy on MMY. > > > > Or Tony just decided to do that on his own since MMY > > was no longer around to contradict him. > > > If it turns out to be true, I would say it is 50/50 at best that MMY ever > knew about it at all. >
