--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <no_re...@...> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues" <curtisdeltablues@> > wrote: > > > > You are expressing your POV which differs from mine. > > It is very revealing that you would think of it as > > what "actually" happened. > > Ignoring the context,
<snicker> Riiiiiiight. this is an important > statement on Curtis' part, and IMO nails the > essential difference between him and others > on this forum. Curtis would never claim that > his POV on a subject defined "what actually > happened." Others *have no problem* making > this statement. > > You see this egoist approach pretty much every > day on this forum. People (mainly long-term > TMers) expressing their opinion or POV on a > subject, or Maharishi's opinion or POV on a > subject, or the Vedas' opinion or POV on a > subject, and declaring it, essentially, TRUTH, > "what actually happens." Sez Barry, cleverly ignoring the fact that I was talking about a record of words on a page that anyone can read, not an individual POV or opinion. Or does Barry want to claim that the record of words on a page does not represent what the posters' fingers typed on their keyboard? And of course Curtis and Barry both, when it served their self-interest, have insisted that similar records of words on a page represent what actually happened. (Except that Barry has been known to lie about what's on the record.)
