--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <jst...@...> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "lurkernomore20002000" <steve.sundur@> 
> wrote:
> > 
> > I have to say my take on this is competely different.  My
> > feeling is that Barry prefers not to bring this up.
> 
> Oh, please. He injects it into every conversation
> that gives him an opening to do so.
> 
> > Shemp in particulary loves to excoriate Barry over this.
> 
> That's one reason why Barry does it, to get Shemp
> going so he can claim Shemp is "jealous."
> 



Which is, of course, a joke.

I am supposed to believe that some cult guru who committed suicide knew how to 
levitate.

Even if true, how would getting excited about such a person be a feather in 
one's cap?  I, for one, would be embarrassed and ashamed that I was associated 
with such a person.






>  And it appears that we have a second
> > corroboration of Lenz's levitation.  And what's wrong if
> > the guy did levitate.
> 
> Not a thing. It's the way Barry uses it that's the
> problem, as I said:
> 
> <snip>
> > > Oh, bullcrap. You bring up Rama at every possible
> > > opportunity, *especially* the flash, exactly
> > > *because* you perceive it to inspire jealousy in
> > > others.
> > >
> > > It never occurs to you that, far from being
> > > jealous, they're mocking you for your preoccupation
> > > with it and the importance you accord it.
> > >
> > > You live, at least on this forum, to make others
> > > feel inferior to you. And you compulsively attribute
> > > all negative reaction to your self-exaltation to
> > > jealousy.
>


Reply via email to