--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings <no_re...@...> wrote:
[snip] > They are both for science over religious Neocon fanaticism. > [snip] I can't imagine that you are referring to anything but embryonic stem cell research, as this is the primary science over religion issue prevalent in American society today. Ron Paul's record on this issue is the COMPLETE OPPOSITE of what you write above and claim is his position. Here is Ron Paul's positions: - Embryonic stem cell programs not constitionally authorized. (May 2007) - Voted NO on expanding research to more embryonic stem cell lines. (Jan 2007) - Voted NO on allowing human embryonic stem cell research. (May 2005) From: http://www.ontheissues.org/TX/Ron_Paul.htm Off_World, you stand corrected. I've now shown you that of the ONLY THREE issues that you said Paul was the same on as Obama that one of them he is the complete opposite from Obama. In another post I've shown you that on two of the other biggest issues of our time -- global warming and abortion -- Paul is the complete opposite from Obama. Must we continue this? Is it not obvious that you are so completely wrong as to be embarrassing yourself?
