Vaj: > I never mentioned anyone other than your guru-neighbor. > It's just that many of your comments seem to imply that your gurus are better than mine, and that you're a better person for it. As I pointed out, some of your gurus have been anything but role models.
But, just because your guru had a mistress doesn't prove that all Tibetan lamas are scoundrels. Your comments just seem prejudiced against Hindus and Texans. In Texas, those charged with crimes are assumed to innocent until proven guilty, *in a trial*. > Are there more? > Who knows, but I'm not trying to defend the Swami next door. In fact, I've spent years refuting the Swami on Usenet. He could be guilty, but there' been no trial. Why didn't you tell us that three of your gurus have been charged with being deviates? That would have been more honest, I think, than implying that Hindu Swamis in Texas are all sex criminals. Vaj: "According to Swami Prakashananda Saraswati, fingering little girls is where it's at. Apparently, it's just like fingering the goddess. After all, this is Texas! Yee ha! Jai Guru Dev!" /FairfieldLife/message/243062