--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Joe" <geezerfr...@...> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues" > > <curtisdeltablues@> wrote: > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > > > Goddamn Barry! You just handed me at least an hour of my > > > life back today responding to Judy. Thanks man. > > > > De nada. Call me a codependent Victorian, but no one > > gets away with calling The Simpsons "mean" when I'm > > around. That's treading on *my* religion. :-) Besides, > > I'm about to head out on a Road Trip, and I figure me > > chiming in again will make her so mad she'll have > > posted out before I even get where I'm going. :-) > > Whaddya know Barry.....you're right! Look at her go!
Lessee now, that would be three posts, two responding to Barry's two posts, and the other to Curtis's. Wow! I sure am posting out fast, just as Barry predicted! <cackle> It's funny, religious people believe stuff for which there's no evidence; but the religion critics here (I don't dare use the word "antireligionists" because it upsets Barry) believe stuff for which there not only is no evidence, but for which all the evidence is *to the contrary*--even when that contrary evidence is right smack under their noses. As Tartbrain has sagely observed, "Trying to correct other's false beliefs before correction all of ones own false beliefs is folly."
