What am I missing here? Let's assume the story is true. (i think someone posted something to say it wasn't, but let's say it's true) You've go 99% of the people in the world applauding this women, who doesn't want someone to her steal her hard earned money, and is willing to risk her life to that end, and then you've got an unlikely alliance of Barry, Judy, and Rick twisting this around to make Dixon appear as though he is advocating arbitrary "culling" of those he deems undesireable. Yes, this guy IS undesireable, and the risk he takes when he violates someone else's rights is that he can also lose his own life, or get harmed. And aren't we all better for it? Hell yea, we are.
And while I'm at it, although I'm not the type to be overly patriotic, it warms my heart when I hear about another tailiban target taken out by unmanned drones. Of course, sometimes innocent civilians are mistakedly targeted, and killed, and that bothers me. But during these times, and circumstances you've got to meet force with force, or force with greatr force, and that helps keep the world safe. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <jst...@...> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Rick Archer" <rick@> wrote: > > > Mike Dixon wrote: > <snip> > > > Human Beings aren't an endangered species. I have no > > > problem *culling* society of those that live on the edge, > > > endangering the rest of us for their lack of intelligence > > > or compassion. > > > > So you get to decide who gets culled? I have a problem > > with that. Do you think everyone should carry guns around > > and just cull anyone they think needs culling? > > And Mike, what if it turns out somebody else thinks > *you're* among those who should be culled (quite > possibly for the same reasons)? >
