--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "wayback71" <waybac...@...> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "wayback71" <wayback71@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "wayback71" <wayback71@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > If Tm is in straits now, > > > > > > > > It's not, > > > > > > > > and Judith's book rings true, > > > > > > > > Who cares ? > > > > > > > > it may take a toll on the TMO as people get really upset or at least > > > > filled with doubts. > > > > > > > > They won't and why should they ? > > > > Only small fish, and non-meditators like I understand you are get upset > > > > by small things. > > > > > > > Nabby, > > > 1. I am a long-time meditator, a teacher of TM in fact > > > > I Did'nt know that. > > > > > 2. I have suspected for many many many years that the stuff purportedly > > > in Judith's book is true - even way before the topic was brought up here > > > on FFL > > > > And ? What's your point ? > > > > > 3. Yet I still think TM is powerful and do it and am eternally grateful > > > to Maharishi for so much > > > > Nice. He saved this this planet from self-destruction ofcourse. > > > > > 4. So, it has been a struggle to integrate, or maybe not at times, the > > > conflicting viewpoints > > > > Where is the conflict ? Some people enjoy each others company mentally, > > physically or both, nothing wrong with that. > > > > > 5. The big question remains: who really is the true believer, the > > > devotee, in all this - the person who denies things they don't want to > > > know or refuses to consider anything "negative"? > > > > Why is sex negative ? > > > > or the person who tries to deal with the information they find difficult > > to accept? > > > > I don't have the answer to this, but I do wonder just how true believers > > will respond to some info that is not so "light." > > > > I still don't understand your problem. > > > >
>snip He was not what most of us thought he was - a celibate monk. He said he was a monk and we all assumed celibate went with that. Good old projection. Nothing wrong with that, happens all the time. snip
