Nablusoss is quite correct here. There is an orthodoxy on this board that paints the TM movement as a dying organization manned by a few benighted holdouts from the 1970s and 1980s. The facts suggest otherwise. I just received, for example, a fund-raising letter from MUM pointing out that enrollment is double what it was ten years ago. The University has done extremely well in creating four programs that people actually want to study: Sustainable Living, Media and Communications, Computer Professionals, and the Accounting MBA. The University has also just received, according to this letter, a $1 million grant from the NIH for research. MUM does not seem like a failing institution to me. Money may be tight, but that is no doubt the same for most small colleges in this economic climate.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 <no_re...@...> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck" <dhamiltony2k5@> wrote: > > > > > Yes, I agree. Is thin soup looking at the 'glorious past' as we well know. > > That part rings hollow. > > > > Missing in the re-start since MMY's death is any statement that they are > > not the manifest bad of the past > > or any statement otherwise of what they are new for the future. Like a > > moral code. Of > > ethic about how they are going to do business. People know the difference > > when they see it and they voted with their feet all through the 80's, 90's > > and 00's. > > Stop this childish and ridicelous whining. > The TMO is expanding as never before - just look at what is happening in > South-America, Africa, Eastern-Europe and Asia ! > > That they have no longer a place for idiots like you or other westerners that > are not able to keep their house clean are to their credit only ! > > Want to go go back in time, to the glorious '70 perhaps ? Please do so > knowing that the Movement belongs to those that Move. >
