--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 <no_re...@...> wrote:
>
> 
> 
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley" <j_alexander_stanley@> 
> wrote:
> >
> > 
> > 
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, FFL PostCount <ffl.postcount@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Fairfield Life Post Counter
> > > ===========================
> > > Start Date (UTC): Sat Jun 05 00:00:00 2010
> > > End Date (UTC): Sat Jun 12 00:00:00 2010
> > > 427 messages as of (UTC) Fri Jun 11 00:06:06 2010
> > > 
> > > 51 authfriend <jstein@>
> > 
> > I can't see a Yahoo glitch or accidental double-post to explain
> > this. Last night's post count was 46, and you posted 5 more
> > times today, so it was a miscount on your end. You can post
> > again on the evening of Friday, June 18th.
> 
> One (1) small mistake and the most articulate writer on FFL is
> banned for a week ? I hope you see how ridicelous that looks.

I am a great admirer of Judy's extraordinarily sharp intellect, however 
enforcement of the post count rule isn't weighted according to the quality of 
posts. I checked the website log for any deletions she may have made, and I 
looked for any unintentional errors or server glitches. There were none. I even 
manually counted her posts on my own email feed to double check the count. 
Bottom line: She started the day knowing she only had four more posts left, and 
she posted five. Unless Rick can come up with a reason why the rule should be 
unfairly not applied to her, she's outta here for a week.

Reply via email to