--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 <no_re...@...> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley" <j_alexander_stanley@> > wrote: > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, FFL PostCount <ffl.postcount@> wrote: > > > > > > Fairfield Life Post Counter > > > =========================== > > > Start Date (UTC): Sat Jun 05 00:00:00 2010 > > > End Date (UTC): Sat Jun 12 00:00:00 2010 > > > 427 messages as of (UTC) Fri Jun 11 00:06:06 2010 > > > > > > 51 authfriend <jstein@> > > > > I can't see a Yahoo glitch or accidental double-post to explain > > this. Last night's post count was 46, and you posted 5 more > > times today, so it was a miscount on your end. You can post > > again on the evening of Friday, June 18th. > > One (1) small mistake and the most articulate writer on FFL is > banned for a week ? I hope you see how ridicelous that looks.
I am a great admirer of Judy's extraordinarily sharp intellect, however enforcement of the post count rule isn't weighted according to the quality of posts. I checked the website log for any deletions she may have made, and I looked for any unintentional errors or server glitches. There were none. I even manually counted her posts on my own email feed to double check the count. Bottom line: She started the day knowing she only had four more posts left, and she posted five. Unless Rick can come up with a reason why the rule should be unfairly not applied to her, she's outta here for a week.
