--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley" <j_alexander_stan...@...> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley" <j_alexander_stanley@> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, FFL PostCount <ffl.postcount@> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > Fairfield Life Post Counter > > > > =========================== > > > > Start Date (UTC): Sat Jun 05 00:00:00 2010 > > > > End Date (UTC): Sat Jun 12 00:00:00 2010 > > > > 427 messages as of (UTC) Fri Jun 11 00:06:06 2010 > > > > > > > > 51 authfriend <jstein@> > > > > > > I can't see a Yahoo glitch or accidental double-post to explain > > > this. Last night's post count was 46, and you posted 5 more > > > times today, so it was a miscount on your end. You can post > > > again on the evening of Friday, June 18th. > > > > One (1) small mistake and the most articulate writer on FFL is > > banned for a week ? I hope you see how ridicelous that looks. > > I am a great admirer of Judy's extraordinarily sharp intellect, however > enforcement of the post count rule isn't weighted according to the quality of > posts. I checked the website log for any deletions she may have made, and I > looked for any unintentional errors or server glitches. There were none. I > even manually counted her posts on my own email feed to double check the > count. Bottom line: She started the day knowing she only had four more posts > left, and she posted five. Unless Rick can come up with a reason why the rule > should be unfairly not applied to her, she's outta here for a week. >
To clarify, I was not implying that Judy intentionally over-posted. What I was trying to convey is that an accurate post count was posted the night before, showing 4 more posts, and for whatever reason, she posted 5 more times.
