Turq, All is fair. I can not disagree with your comments, this time. LOL You have good focus. I do like when Stein puts you in your place. All is fun. Where is Stein? You two should marry. : )
I appreciate you taking time to dissect the below. I just keep wondering if there was/is a better way for the TMO to forward itself. ... wait, I think you gave an intelligent answer to that in a previous post, in a previous thread. In the TMO, there is rather a huge focus on the faces who make accomplishments, commercially and I am not one to really do something just because a figure head did or does. That is a teenager's way of thinking. lol I like teenagers, when they are teenagers in their teens. lol. When it carries on to superficial adults, I tend to not wish to go that route. I wish not to bash you Turq. Nabby, well, it goes both ways with him. Jar Jar Binks is easy to pick on. : ________________________________ From: TurquoiseB <no_re...@yahoogroups.com> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Sun, 5 September, 2010 7:04:09 AM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: A great opportunity for service --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, ditzyklanmail <carc...@...> wrote: > > Dear Turq, > > His work is interesting. Compliments to the Lynch man for wanting > to share art illuminating the depth of ignorance. An interesting phrase, one I cannot disagree with. The word "Why?" keeps popping into my head, but the phrase is accurate. > Why the TMO embraces him, I do question. > Does anyone in Fairfield dive their talents into dark art and > are not embraced or rather discouraged from dark art because > it is an unenlightened way of thinking? I do not live there and cannot say what happens in Fairfield. In general, I think that there is a certain reverence for the famous in TM circles, and I think it's fair to say that this came from Maharishi. He was attracted to fame like a moth to a flame, and liked to surround himself with famous faces. It didn't seem to matter what the person did to become famous, only that he was famous. > I would like to know why the double standard, or why it > appears that way. Is it because of donations that are > gathered? These days, very possibly. For Maharishi himself, in all honesty I think he was attracted more to the fame than the money. The money just came *with* the famous people, and to him as a result of being photographed with them. > This topic, I am only wanting answers to what comes naturally > to question. Deep rest brings more creativity as it is said, > these email groups are creative, so no one is wrong to > display opinion. Except when someone displays an opinion that pushes buttons. Then we need our oracles to tell us which opinion is right and which is wrong. :-) > This email is not attempting to bash the TMO nor David Lynch. This reply is not attempting to bash the TMO, David Lynch, ditzyklanmail, or anyone else on this forum. I will take the opportunity, however, to bash Stanley Weisenbaum, who stole my girlfriend in seventh grade. Guy was a shithead.
