--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, blusc0ut <no_reply@...> wrote: > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, blusc0ut <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > > > > For me this discussion was over years ago. Either one understand His > > > > work, try to understand it, or dismiss it. > > > > > > > Or one tries to get a balanced view instead of a black and white one, see > > > the bad AND the good, see the corruption > > > > > > What corruption ? > > Lies, deception for example. It was often argued by movement people that with > those lies, incentives Maharishi tricked us into doing things regarded as > benefitial. (like being consistent in the program.) > > > AND the truth, see the benefit AND the damage > > > > What damage ? > > Financial damage for example.Feelings of guilt imposed on people > 'misbehaving' and resulting conflicts for many years! > > > . IOW understanding instead of blind adoration. > > > > > > You claim understanding ? Fine, more power to you ! > > No, I don't claim complete understanding. But understanding in terms of a > differentiated view. Not blind adoration, not complete condemnation. The > balance will be different for everybody. For some, the positive will > outweight the negative, for some the negative will outweight the positive. >
> Maharishi one time said, that the guru has to crash the world of the > disciple. Well, the movement was very much the world of the committed TMer. Very well observed indeed; the Movement is nothing; His Lila was to dismantel it long ago.
