Thanks Willytex, on second thoughts this make sense. I was giving the benefit of doubt to the person for anonymity. Now I can see that person is very cheap to make attacks like that, at least when I attacked people everyone knew my face and all my personal details and I only attacked individuals. However Dan shouldn't be looking for any help from Rick - he is highly diplomatic and completely head oriented (and this is from personal observation when I met him).
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "WillyTex" <willytex@...> wrote: > > > > Ravi Yogi: > > Peter - Dan may have requested something unreasonable > > like the person's identity but what makes you attribute > > anger to his posts. I felt he was hurt rather than mad > > when he posted it... > > > Dan was just saying that a anonymous psycho-therapist > probably should not be casting aspersions on whole groups > of people without knowing the facts. > > It's not really very professional to slander someone on > a public forum without the slightest evidence of any > wrong doing. His letter sounds like someone trying to > lay blame without taking control of their own past > actions - it's an example of trash-talk about on the level > of John Knapp, the exit counselor on TM-Free. > > I'd be embarrassed if I was a psychologist and someone > had posted my letter on the internet. Whoever wrote that > letter was obviously biased, not an impartial social > scientist! The guys letter makes the Kaplin letter look > like a masterpiece! >
