..AHEMMMM!...
It is a lack of faith. There are plants that are 'superplants', whole foods in and of themselves that are growing in salt water- and one in sand and no very little water- recent discoveries- you can call it evolution; or you can call it Divine Beauty of Love Intent- Whatever happens there is always a way of sustaining. If the population grows, new palnts that take less land mass will be- and are now, being discovered. It will be a change, a different way of energy (food) consumption. And there's always other things like sungazing and pulling from stars for energy, and a plethera of other means of sustaining life. ...ANNND what if we just changed (end of the world as we know it- and I m feelin fine)...our life form into a different structure, one that is not dependent on ingesting dying cell structures, be it carrot or animal- what if ? What if that is what the Mayans meant? We are all only drawing on energy sources and there is an intelligent plan. Do not doubt. Go and fill the earth and know things will not stay the same, yet this stays the same- God , in His Love, has made ways, and there will always be a way. It will be beautiful. Believe. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "John" <jr_esq@...> wrote: > > The ideal is to have a sustainable population growth. China has drastically > cut its population growth which may be a detriment in the future. Due to the > population decrease, they may not have enough young people to take over their > booming economy and to care for their aging population. > > This same scenario can be said for Japan, and European countries like Sweden > and France. > > Nonetheless, it is true that many poor countries are increasing more rapidly > in population than the more affluent countries. In these countries, it would > be appropriate to curb the growth to sustain its economy, population and > style of living. > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "PaliGap" <compost1uk@> wrote: > > > > "Gro Harlem Brundtland, the UN Chair for the World > > Commission on Environment and Development, worries > > that population growth is a "ticking time bomb" and > > that "we may soon be facing a new famine on a scale > > dwarfing even Malthus's most pessimistic predictions". > > > > Gro Harlem Brundtland has FOUR children. > > > > Brundtland's views were heavily influenced by her > > father who went to America on a Rockefeller > > scholarship, according to the UN. At the age of seven > > she was enrolled in the Children's section of the > > Norwegian Labour Movement. > > > > Al Gore says that Third World nations are producing > > too many children too fast and that it's time to cut > > out-of-control population growth, which is driving > > global warming. > > > > Al Gore has FOUR children. > > > > James Lovelock believes that we are headed for global > > catastrophe because of overpopulation and that Malthus > > was right to say that "overpopulation would ruin us all" > > > > Lovelock has FOUR children > > > > Ted Turner believes that overpopulation is the world's > > number one problem and has said that a Chinese style > > one-child policy should be enforced. > > > > Turner has FIVE children. > > > > David Suzuki has argued that when it comes to > > population "there' s got to be limits" and he fears "a > > big human die-off" because of overpopulation and > > overconsumption. > > > > David Suzuki has FIVE children. > > > > David Guillabaud of the Optimum Population Trust wants > > all women to be injected with a semi-permanent birth > > control vaccine when they hit puberty, to help control > > the population. > > > > Guillebaud has THREE children. > > > > All of these people are wealthy members of society > > whose children will require resouces and land to enjoy > > themselves. Thank you for not breeding." > > > > http://hauntingthelibrary.wordpress.com/2011/01/27/thank > > -you-for-not-breeding-green-hypocrisy/ > > > > (Still, they can't exactly take their kids back, can > > they!) > > >
