--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "wayback71" <wayback71@...> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Joe" <geezerfreak@> wrote: > > > > Yes, I had a real champ for a surgeon, and this time the > > out of control flutter was completely taken care of. > > Another long ass procedure (5 hours including an ETT > > study) but, aside from feeling a bit sore, I have a new > > appreciation for western medicine and the value of a > > properly functioning heart. > > > > While I was out though, I did come across a gentleman > > named Maitreya. He passes along this message...it was > > all a joke, just a small part in the film Dogma. > > I second this - glad you are alive and well. Also, when > you saw him, did Maitreya have powerful Darshan? Did > he mention B Creme? Raj Patel?
More important, has he seen Elvis lately, and does the King have a message for us? > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Rick Archer" <rick@> wrote: > > > > > > On Behalf Of Joe > > > > > > I notice that many here call any observation of MMY that is > > > anything less than worshipful "bashing". > > > > > > So much easier to see the world in black and white rather > > > than a multitude of shades (as I know you do.) What I find a more fascinating phenomenon is that a few posters on this forum who routinely act as cult apologists for Maharishi and the TMO (that is, almost *every* time a criticism is made of either, they have to step in to "excuse" it or "explain it away") don't realize that they're doing it. They been trained to do this so effectively that they don't notice when they do it. So how are they going to notice the corollary, which is that very often the *next* thing they do after making excuses for Maharishi or the TMO is bash the person who offered the criticism? It's like the "training" has been so effective that they have can only act in the moment -- react -- and are incapable of recognizing the *trends* in their reactions. Weird, if you ask me...
