Rajas are all sweet and humble people doing more than anyone for the betterment 
of the world. It really ugly to make the kind of comments you have about good 
people. You are getting right into the groove of the blame and complain crowd 
of this group.

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck" <dhamiltony2k5@...> wrote:
>
> > 
> > "(5) the end of one cycle is always the beginning of another"
> > 
> > I wonder, just watching the Aljazeera egypt broadcast, how that would apply 
> > to the present situation in the TM movement, which looks like it is in a 
> > state of induced coma. Hasn't Maharishi said, the movement belongs to those 
> > who move? Hasn't he said in an interview before his death, that all the 
> > initiators are his successors.
> > 
> > As Judy pointed out recently, nature may 'want' something else despite of 
> > our choices. And that may apply to the movement itself. (See, I don't think 
> > the Maharishi Effect, if it exists, necessarily always works the way 
> > we--including Maharishi--expect or intend it to.) What I am trying to aim 
> > at is, that all the crazyness of the movement recently, Rajaism etc. could 
> > be just a means to wake the people in the movement up. Obviously nobody in 
> > the upper movement has the balls to do something essential to save it. All 
> > look paralyzed at each other it seems. Just a thought.
> > 
> 
> 
> BluScout, good observation.
> Our TM- Rajas are like any of the autocrats of the Arab world right now.  Out 
> of control, isolated and just watching what the people are doing. Probably a 
> lot like Mubarac hold up somewhere these last few days watching the news 
> feeds of his people. And wishing to shut down the damn internet.
> 
> I listened to a person here in FF who was doing a survey of meditators 
> locally looking at housing needs.  The person was just surveying to know what 
> people wanted.  But was stunned by the extremely vehement and aggravated 
> response that were drawn when the survey questions went over to sthapatya 
> vedic architecture (!).  The surveyor was shocked (!) how strong the 
> vehemence was and how it rolled over in to everything about the TMmovement 
> from just asking about SthapatyaV.   The survey was not particularly about 
> SthpatyaV. The surveyor was a little shell-shocked that this was in about 
> half of the surveying.   
> 
> -Buck
> 
> > 
> > Well, shit yes if they have guts to act. Yep, a great example of this 
> > within this particular 'dome number' thread would be these damn TM-Rajas.  
> > Take those dome numbers as goal, they are purposefully unifying.  Then a 
> > few things that should help the dome numbers here if these TM-Rajas had 
> > guts along with a spine to act.  A few things would be:
> > 
> > Git rid of that DADT policy & the guidelines and all that about having
> >  seen saints and spiritual teachers.
> > 
> > Ethics: work at being honest every way and being transparent about that.
> > 
> > Work at gathering meditators back by becoming  more spiritually ecumenical, 
> > less abrasive and less arrogant by reaching out to where all the meditators 
> > had went on to.
> > 
> > Specifically deliver a vote of  'no-confidence' in that 'Prime Minister' 
> > who sits in the middle. Regime change.
> > 
> > Retire the current MUM president.  Send him packing around as 'emeritus' 
> > along with some of his people.  Give them all 'Maharishi Awards' but give 
> > someone else the job, authority and power of being President of MUM now.
> > 
> > Stop fealty testing.  Just facilitate and plain welcome the meditators back.
> > 
> > And of course drop entirely the robes, crowns and that invincibility sales 
> > pitch thing everywhere. Even to the January 12th birthday party in the 
> > dome. Or something like Guru Purnima. Jeesus.
> > 
> > But no, instead they defeat the numbers at every turn in action.  They and 
> > we are in deep shit with the dome numbers because they are such piss-poor 
> > doers in life.  They are in charge of that.  The buck stops there.  It's 
> > life in the body and they are failing with the numbers.  It's a damned 
> > shame.
> > 
> > JGD,
> > -Buck
> > 
> >
>


Reply via email to