--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Joe" <geezerfreak@...> wrote: > > I notice the same thing recently with regard to Judith's book. Before it came > out, many of the TB minded folk here denied the possibility of MMY being > "other than chaste" with women in the strongest terms. > > Once the book came out (and other women began to come forward) the deniers > were (in many cases) able to accommodate the new info and flip to a "I don't > care that MMY did this" posture. > > The 100% deniers here dwindled down to just one AFAIK, WillyTex. Oh, and > maybe Nabby. (Or did Nabby go the "it doesn't matter" route?) >(snip) The only people whom it seems to matter to, are those who have put Maharishi up on a pedistal of being 'His Divine Maharishi Mahesh Yogi'...who he is refered to in this way....
The same with Jesus; there are some who interpreted his life to be so immaculate, that they put him up into the Divine, and forget he was a man, a human being. So, this had more to do with people's interpretation of the image of the man, and the innate fantasy's they have in general, in relation to their world view... So, to fathom something that is opposed to their world view, which they hold to in a sacrificial way, prevents their intuition from funtioning properly... R.,
