Judy,

Here's a video clip that talks about the ruins in Tihuanaco, estimated to be as 
old as 17,000, and Pumapunko, may be older than the former.  These ruins are in 
Bolivia.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vMviviXAIVI

JR






--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <jstein@...> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "John" <jr_esq@> wrote:
> >
> > This is an interesting article.  But there's a building
> > site with sophisticated stonework in Peru that may be
> > older than 20,000 years.  So, archeologists need to
> > factor this fact into their academic theories.
> 
> If you know about it, John, I suspect they do too,
> and have already factored it in. (Do you remember the
> name of this place? Because while there are 20,000-
> year-old sites in Peru, they're coastal hunter-
> gatherer sites with no sophisticated stonework. I'd 
> be interested to know what you're thinking of.)
> 
> The Buttermilk Creek site is said to be the oldest
> in *North* America. Last I heard, Peru was in *South*
> America.
> 
> But speaking of cave paintings rather than spear
> points or stonework, there was a really fabulous
> article in Slate recently, excerpted from Paris
> Review, well worth a read (no photos, sadly):
> 
> America's Ancient Cave Art
> Deep in the Cumberland Plateau, mysterious drawings,
> thousands of years old, offer a glimpse of lost Native
> American cultures and traditions
> 
> http://www.slate.com/id/2288619/
> 
> 
>  
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "WillyTex" <willytex@> 
> 
> wrote:
> > >
> > > "Archaeologists and other scientists report in Friday's 
> > > issue of the journal Science that excavations show 
> > > hunter-gatherers were living at the Buttermilk Creek site 
> > > and making projectile points, blades, choppers and other 
> > > tools from local chert for a long time, possibly as early 
> > > as 15,500 years ago..."
> > > 
> > > Read more:
> > > 
> > > 'Spear Points Found in Texas Dial Back 
> > > Arrival of Humans in America'
> > > New York Times, March 24, 2011
> > > http://tinyurl.com/4gdtw3r
>


Reply via email to