--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb <no_reply@...> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "John" <jr_esq@> wrote: > > > > This part of the discussion reminds me of the Kalam Cosmological > > Argument which goes like this: > > > > 1. Whatever begins to exist has a beginning. > > > > 2. The universe began to exist. > > > > 3. Therefore, the universe has a cause. > > Ahem. Might I point out that point #2 is merely > an assumption on your part, one caused by not > being able to conceive of the universe as eternal > and never-created?
Bbbbut... If the universe is eternal and never-created, it's existence extends back in time to infinity. But as, by definition, an infinite series can never be traversed, how could we be here 'now'?
