--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <jstein@...> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, tartbrain <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "whynotnow7" <whynotnow7@> wrote: > > > > > > Vaj and Barry, in their infantile fascination with themselves, > > > haven't figured our the difference between challenging ideas, > > > and being a royal pain in the ass. > > > > Oh good. I was JUST NOW wondering about the difference between > > these two things. > > Right. It's become evident that you have some trouble making > that distinction. > > > Can you explain to me in detail? I would be most appreciative. > > One rule of thumb is that being a royal pain in the ass > typically involves challenging ideas in a way that suggests > one believes one's own ideas are paradigmatic of a more > advanced degree of spiritual evolution. > > It's tough to hide. One may think one is being so subtle > about it that nobody will notice, but that's usually a > mistake. >
*-)
