--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Robert Gimbel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --- Well, maybe it's just that Maharishi seems to like to put all of > the emphasis on one thing at a time. > > In the beginning, it was just do TM; then it was take SCI, and be a > teacher; then it was do the siddhis, then it was do the siddhis in > the dome, then it was Ayurveda, and Jyotish, and now it's palaces, > rajas, vyastu achetechure, and so on... > > But the whole thing is still based in the unmanifest, according to > Maharishi's teaching: everything comes out of the unmanimest field > of pure consciousness; > So, it's still TM that will get you there, to pure consciousness; > All of the rest are just branches of the tree, expressions of pure > consciousness. > > Like Shakti Gawain, spoke about in "Creative Visualization" it's > good to visualize what you want, especially on the level of feeling, > and leave a space open for it to happen; be open to the possibility > of it happening. > Maharishi, has enormous visions of things which he visualizes would > and could be possible, and he focuses on these one project at a > time, until he sees how far each new concept goes. > But, it is true, that all of this teaching originated, or was > revived with Swami Bramananda Saraswati, , alone in the remote > forest, with no palace, living in the most simple and humble way,; > so we can assume that the "Capture of the Fort", of pure > consciousness, is still and always will be of primary relevance..
Good. And the implications of "Capturing the Fort" being of primary relevance is that virtually all of the other crap can be completely and totally ignored and one can still -- just as quickly and as effectively -- reach the goal. > > > > In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > What do they say about the efficacy of the TM technique? > And > > what > > > > > MMY has SAID for the first 30 years of the Movement about > the TM > > > > > technique and the relation the meditator established in > being has > > > > to > > > > > the relative and and his environment? > > > > > > > > He's already said that he missed this point for a very long > time > > > > (need for Vedic architecture). > > > > > > Could "the point" possibly be that he thinks there is > > > more money to be made in construction than in > > > selling meditation? > > > > Possible. OTOH, perhaps he CAN be taken at face value on things? To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
