[FairfieldLife] Speculating about CC instead of doing the work[was Re:Two...questions from Turq]

[Ravi Yogi]

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Rick Archer" <rick@...> wrote:
>
> From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com]
> On Behalf Of sparaig
> Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2011 7:00 PM
> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [FairfieldLife] Speculating about CC instead of doing the work[was
> Re:Two...questions from Turq]
> 
>  
> 
>   
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> <mailto:FairfieldLife%40yahoogroups.com> , "curtisdeltablues"
> <curtisdeltablues@> wrote:
> >
> > If you read what "she said" you could determine the credibility yourself.
> Actual video evidence is rare is nay sex case for obvious reasons, so it is
> up to the jury to determine the credibility of the witness. Since Judith's
> account was backed up by an even more credible witness,for me the case is
> closed. YMMV.
> 
> Someone was in the room with them?
> 
>  
> 
> Have you read the book Lawson? Those who haven't done so sound pretty
> foolish when trying to dismiss its credibility.
>

Would you care to give a brief summary of why you think it's credible? If you 
are going to lose any commission on this book by doing so please forgive me and 
feel free to ignore.