Spot on Jim, it's total rejection of anything positive, post after post, question after question and total acceptance of everything negative, no questions asked. If someone talks positive it's all subjective experience, opinion, mind control, lacking any benefit to the world, trying to feel special but if it's negative they turn into authentic, genuine, credible witnesses.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "whynotnow7" <whynotnow7@...> wrote: > > Funny that the anti-Maharishi, anti-TMO, anti-"enlightenmentudeness" clique here continuously claims that those who make positive claims about Maharishi, the TMO and enlightenment are doing so to garner attention and feel special and elevated above others. The same could easily be said about those claiming to have had sex with Maharishi. After all, what would be more special than that? "Look at me, I boinked Maharishi...". Yeah, look at you, center stage... > > There is also a propensity among this anti-everything-Maharishi crowd to question any experience had in the presence of Maharishi. Why not seriously question these claims of sex? After all, this could be some kind of fantasy fulfillment for the women involved, after rounding for years and becoming progressively more and more unstable (as we are always told by the TM detractors here regarding the results of TM and TMSP). It sounds like confirmation bias to me. > > Regardless of our opinions, there is zero evidence of Maharishi having had sex with anyone. Lots of hearsay, accusations, rumors and beliefs- an airtight case within airtight minds- however the only things missing are *facts* and *evidence*. > > Seems that going after this sacred cow of MMY having sex isn't in the best interests of those with an agenda against Maharishi, doesn't support their story, their version of reality that they cling to so dearly. >
