Could you try translating that to English, please? Thanks.
L. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister <no_reply@...> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <vajradhatu@> wrote: > > > > > > On Jul 15, 2011, at 4:54 PM, sparaig wrote: > > > > > Certainly that is the case, that the TM researchers thought (and still > > > do) that these episodes are significant. I'm curious as to why you think > > > they are not? > > > > > > Because there's been nothing demonstrated as outside the normal realm of > > waking-dreaming-sleeping for one. > > > > But the primary source is yogic literature itself, which defines the > > different types of breath suspensions in considerable detail. The Hindu > > science of breath is quite detailed. > > > > Hmm...at least Bhojadeva in his commentary on YS, seems to > define the fourth praaNaayaama simply as 'stambha-ruupo gati- > vicchedaH': > > tau dvau viShayAvAkShipya paryAlochya yaH stambharUpI (?typo; > I think it should be 'stambharUpo') gativichChedaH > sa chaturthaH prANAyAmaH >
