--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <vajradhatu@...> wrote: > > > On Aug 4, 2011, at 7:46 PM, sparaig wrote: > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote: > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Xenophaneros Anartaxius" > > > <anartaxius@> wrote: > > > <snip> > > > > and back to the first blogger, we have a report of a > > > > Wikipedia editor speaking of the troubles they were > > > > having with articles related to TM, with editors who > > > > came online removing all negative references to the > > > > practice and people in the organisation. > > > > > > The "Wikipedia editor" in question is Andrew Skolnick, > > > who is even more violently biased against TM than Vaj. > > > His description of what was going on with TM-related > > > articles should be taken with a large saltshaker handy. > > > As far as Skolnick is concerned, any negative reference > > > to TM is one that should be preserved, regardless of > > > its degree of accuracy. > > > > > > > ANdrew accused me of reverting an entire section when I first came into > > Wikipedia. He appolgized after I pointed out that I didn't even know HOW to > > revert at that point in time so he double checked and sure-'nuff... > > > Andrew is probably one of the most insightful people when it comes to � and > valid criticism. It's that naked, raw insight that so disturbs �-TB's. And > he has a real knack for spotting habitual liars and that always gets their > goat. >
Shall I invite Andrew to come critique everyone here? His background is such that he will, at best, call you self-deluded for what you (and I and Judy and everyone else) espouse here. Lawson
