--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb <no_reply@...> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, maskedzebra <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > Bzzzzzzt. Any argument that depends on "buy in" to either > > the concept of God or belief that you or anyone else knows > > what his/her/its perspective is is of no interest to me. You > > react to my question about considering subjective belief > > to be objective fact by declaring your subjective belief to > > be objective fact. > > > > Not for the first time, all that this inspires in me is a sense of > > incredulity that people in Fairfield could ever have considered > > your narcissism worth listening to, much less following. No > > offense, but I do not share their level of gullibility. Thanks > > for your reply, but run your stuck-inside-your-own-head > > egotrip on someone else, eh?
>Turquoiseb: > > Your response deeply disappoints me, Turquoiseb. Like I give a shit. RESPONSE: You're playing off key here, Turq: you missed the irony. And if you go around missing irony you're closing off half of reality (these days, anyway: 21st century: irony is the closest thing to what used to be the truth: In fact irony fills the vacuum where God used to bemy opinion, mind). Should I take it that this impression and judgment of > me is objective? Absolutely not. It is purely subjective. It's called a brush-off, as in "Not interested in debating with you." You make take it either personally or as a generic brush-off aimed at all people who attempt to suck me into ego-arguments with them, as you wish. RESPONSE: But no, Turquoiseb, you are mistaken. You think you are exercising your free will in giving me admittedly the "brush-off", whereas in fact [you still there, Turquoiseb?no sense continuing this if you're not: Oh, you're a little bit there? That's fine then; I will carry on] you are, without any freedm to do otherwise, reacting to something about me, which requires that, in order for your POV to remain consistent and immutable (although you yourself don't know it is this), you as a matter of principle exclude listening to anything I might say. Hold it, Turqoiseb: I am *not saying you are wrong* about me. Not at all. I am just saying that your preempting the experience of finding out that you are right, based upon your experience of hearing me out, limits, severely limits, the reliability of your categorical judgment of me. TURQUOISEB [as imagined]: Will you just STFU, Robin? I have made my point already. You are a dunce to keep hammering away at me. Trying to turn me into a disciple, are you? I'm already taken. That's why when I smell some ex-cult leader sending out his egotistical vibe, I recognize it, and I remain true to my Mastermy last one. Who committed an act guaranteed to bend his followers's minds in perpetuity. I merely asked people to weigh in with their responses to the questions I posed. I did not imply I'd debate the issue with them. If you really feel the need to do this, find someone else, someone who gives a shit about your theories. Because they ARE theories, dude. :-) RESPONSE: These are not theories, Turq: they were revealed to me by a little Canadian fairy, and he said: Robin: Count on it. What I am about to tell you is true. So I went for it. Who is to say my fairy friend lied to me? So far I seem to be doing pretty good: except in two blatant caseswhich continue to torment me. Oh oh. I think maybe Turq has closed things down. Yeah, for sure that's what he's done. I think my subjectivity lost some of its claim to objectivity in the futility of this attempt of mine to love you, Turquoiseb.
