Very good review about TM and very great advice to the TMO!
Precisely why I read your posts, even if some are long winded, sometimes. lol.
Note how I have to give a compliment with a cut down (it helps my self
esteem). : )
When people are comfortable, it makes them want things to come easy. The focus
on TM sold to PTSD of the military, the poor children and prisoners, is because
those have public money behind them and someone wants a piece of it, but public
money is going down the tubes with the economy.
Self esteem building is a great way to market TM, as you suggest. Only one
thing, those that are at the top, usually only get to stay at the top when
others need hero's or "rock stars," to honor and worship. If everyone felt
better about themselves, who would worship those who recorded a song 50 years
ago as a teenage boy except a bunch of screaming girls with low self esteem
continuing into late adulthood? Marketability in the past has been based on
this principal?
You turq, have a wonderfully great idea that the TMO needs to take seriously.
(You bad Buddha rubbing belly renegade, you.)
Self esteem. TM can help poor children be content to being poor. A PTSD
soldier feels content at all the carnage he has witnessed and participated in.
The prisoner, a locked up yogi. A wealthy movie star has a tax write off and so
on.
If self esteem was always intended for the teaching of TM, it would be present
in may other ways, including most of Fairfield's non dome attending mediators
would be included in the WPA's and all and few would have their badges taken
away.
The pageant of ceremonial Raja's and the famous on display in TM, "Look, we are
great, do you want to be like us? You wish to gain just like your idols and we
meditate and that is how we do it."
(I am a TM meditator and I feel the Maharishi played a funny trick on his team
of Rajas. I think the Maharishi was not happy with them, but needed them, but
he knew he was getting old and closer to leaving the earth, and what better way
to point out the obvious, was to dress them up in gold crowns and white robes
(note the Indians don't wear them.)so we, real people doing the techniques with
nothing to gain, but self esteem would see the difference. Sort of like, "The
Emperor Wears No Clothes," except Maharishi re-wrote the fairy tale a bit as he
giggled knowing the knowers, will, "Get it." I, "get it." hahaha.
If you ask most Indians in the movement about this, they would most likely roar
in laughter and forever be your friend. : )
Because even if the self esteem is increasing for the average TMer, there is
still a caste system in the TMO, of who has the biggest wallet. The government
(public funding) appears to have the biggest wallet and that is why the PR
companies are hired by the TMO to present this idea to the masses. Easy money
and a tax right off.
Self esteem building works well in the private sector, but they may lose non
profit status and have to start paying taxes, but I am no expert in that
subject or any. lol.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb <no_reply@...> wrote:
>
> The last week or so has been Viewer Hell for this cinema addict. I've
> had to wade through a number of TV pilots that I would never have spent
> a moment on if a potential client hadn't asked me to review them. It was
> a dismaying experience, but I think I learned something from it about
> how the TMO should pitch its one salable product -- basic TM.
>
> I actually looked forward to watching the first two episodes of
> "Ringer," because it stars Sarah Jessica Parker, who I loved in "Buffy."
> It had potential, in that it was actually SJP squared, playing twins.
> Sadly, it had an unimaginative plot, and was full of unhappy, unlikable,
> self-obsessed characters who between the lot of them couldn't come up
> with a thimbleful of positive self esteem if their lives (and their
> ratings) depended on it. As a TV writer, you should know you're in
> trouble when the only admirable character in your show is a former
> addict who now works as a NA counselor. Just sayin'.
>
> Then I watched "2 Broke Girls," memorable only for Kat Dennings'
> delivery of the punchlines of a series of low-rent sexual innuendo
> jokes. Again, it's a show that is all *about* lack of self-esteem...look
> at the title. Next came "New Girl," starring Zooey Deschanel, which was
> the sole redeeming hour of the whole viewing experiment. Zooey is truly
> adorable, and this show puts her in the spotlight, pretty much carrying
> the whole series herself IMO, because I couldn't work up a bit of
> empathy for any of the other characters or actors. Fortunately, I think
> Zooey's up to the challenge, and this one may be a big hit.
>
> But, at the same time, Zooey's character is lack of self esteem
> incarnate. This poor self image is reflected back to her by her three
> male roommates (who have a "Douchebag Jar" into which they have to
> deposit money whenever they act like douchebags...and the jar is usually
> full), her model friend, or any of the guys and gals they ineffectively
> hit on while looking for love in all of the wrong places. Zooey's
> character, ferchrissakes, still wallowing in an embarrassing breakup,
> watches "Dirty Dancing" five or six times a day, sobbing through it. And
> millions of viewers are going to tune in every week *to* watch her
> wallow, because they do the same thing, and can identify with her and
> her big, sad blue eyes.
>
> So, what's my "takeaway" from seeing these TV shows? And how on earth do
> I relate it to the TMO and how it should be marketing TM?
>
> It's the common denominator -- lack of self esteem. If these are all
> going to be popular TV series in America (and they probably all will),
> watched weekly by millions of viewers, what are those viewers seeing
> onscreen and identifying with that makes them want to come back week
> after week for more? Lack of self esteem. Viewers can identify with
> these characters because they feel that same lack themselves.
>
> So I'm thinkin'...how could the TMO better market TM, if what they
> *really* wanted to do was promote its practice, and get the most people
> started with it? Duh. Pitch it as a way to feel better about yourself.
> Instead of pitching it (via the DLF, pretty much the only teaching
> effort being undertaken at this time) to at-risk kids, people in
> prisons, and soldiers suffering from PTSD, get back to pitching it to
> the Common Man. And as much as the groups of people mentioned above need
> something that can boost their self esteem, after this week of watching
> the TV shows they watch, I'm thinkin' that the Common Man can use a bit
> of a boost themselves, and might be convinced to pay a reasonable price
> for it.
>
> Forget the flying crap; only dweebs want to learn to fly. Forget the ME
> stuff; nobody believes it anyway. Get back to the SIMS days, stop
> relying for your income on "milking the faithful," and start marketing
> to new people, pitching something that is of actual interest to them.
> Since the TMO will still feel that it has to do research to sell its
> product, by all means do it. But do research on normal, everyday,
> working people, and limit it to self-surveys of their general feelings
> of self esteem and self worth before starting TM and then after a few
> months of regular practice. I suspect you could come up with some real,
> non-data-massaged results from such studies that would show that TM has
> a real benefit in this area.
>
> Then go out and pitch *that* as a reason for learning TM. Lower the
> price at the same time to make it more reasonable for your target
> audience, and limit what you teach people to the basic mechanics of TM.
> Don't try to "cross sell" the Sidhis or enlightenment; mention them once
> during the basic course, and then don't bring them up again unless
> someone actually *asks* about them. In other words, focus on your one
> salable product, and pitch it at the thing that millions of Americans
> are actually interested in -- self esteem and how to have more of it.
>
> I think it might sell. At $300 a pop, which I feel is a fair price, and
> marketed as a self-therapy for people who want to feel more comfortable
> with themselves, I think TM is still a marketable commodity. Beats the
> crap out of spending many times that amount on mood-elevators and
> anti-depressants. But to market TM successfully to the Common Man, IMO
> its sellers really need to dump all the baggage TM comes with these
> days, which almost no one but the current faithful are interested in.
> It's an uphill battle to try to sell Eventual Enlightenment, and being
> essentially "broken" or unfulfilled until it happens, to an audience
> that is already suffering from an epidemic lack of self esteem. Sell
> them what they're looking for -- a way of becoming more comfortable with
> who they already are.
>
