Jim - yeah I don't pay any attention to it but suppose it's pretty awesome huh? I do speak my native tongue Telugu, and the language I first learned - Hindi and English pretty fluently.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "whynotnow7" <whynotnow7@...> wrote: > > Hi Ravi, If you speak English *and* another language, which I am assuming you do...I consider that an amazing feat, equally impressive as anything I've talked about. > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Ravi Yogi" raviyogi@ wrote: > > > > Thanks but I wouldn't know what that would be :-). > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "whynotnow7" <whynotnow7@> > > wrote: > > > > > > Yep - totally agree. I am sure that you are also inherently free or > > advanced in ways that I am not. :-) > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Ravi Yogi" raviyogi@ wrote: > > > > > > > > Thanks Jim, sounds good, utility then. My point being that even if I > > was able to see them it would just be a bonus, something fun to talk > > about - yes something extra added to my life in terms of utility or fun. > > But it will not make any difference to my completeness, same goes with > > any other siddhis. They are ultimately all material. > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "whynotnow7" <whynotnow7@> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > "I don't see Angels, nor I do believe in them - but certainly can > > see the possibility that a certain refined nervous system can see the > > angles and other celestial being around them. However there is no > > salvation outside of you, so this is all optional entertainment really." > > > > > > > > > > Perhaps at first the experience would be unsettling, however the > > experience of the celestial worlds is sufficiently subtle to be only > > perceived when there is not any sort of excitement or expectation in the > > mind. So it becomes a normal extension of the senses that is rarely used > > or thought about. Only useful if needed, not entertainment ever.:-) > > > > >
