--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Xenophaneros Anartaxius" <anartaxius@...> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > > > -- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister <no_reply@> wrote:> > > > naasadaasiinno sadaasiittadaaniiM> > The pada-paaTha (word reading > > without sandhis):> > na + asat; aasiit na + u sat; aasiit tadaaniiM> > > > Word-for-word that might be for instance:> > not non-existent (a-sat) > > not, "er", existent (sat)> was (aasiit) then (tadaaniim: "before" the> > > Big Bang??).> > > The first line is way "interesting" in many respects.For instance, > > almost all the vowels and diphthongs of Sanskrit are"embedded"(?) in it. > > Those are: > > a, aa/A, i, ii/I, u, uu/U, R (vocalic/syllabic r-sound), RR (sameas > > diirgha or long; rare), L (vocalic/syllabic l-sound, very rare),e > > (always long, because represents[?] former IE diphthong 'ai'),ai > > (represents former IE diphthong 'aai'), o (always long, because > > represents former IE diphthong 'au'), au (represents formerIE diphthong > > 'aau'). > > With a wild imagination, one may speculate that eventhe most famous > > biija-mantra (aum/om) is "hidden" in thatline, 'om' in the > > samhitaa-paaTha and 'aum' in thepada-paaTha: > > (samhitaa) naasadaasiinno sadaasiittadaaniim > > (pada) na + asat; aasiit na + u sat; aasiit tadaaniim > > [:o)] > > > Om is also embedded in the exclamation 'omigosh' (short for oh my gosh!) > > Anyway we have the first line equals (in English) > > 'not non existent not existent then' > > You satisfied with that? >
Abso-effing-lutesly... ;-)
