--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "seventhray1" <steve.sundur@...> wrote: > > I understand what you are saying. I'll be honest. I skim so > lightly whatever Nabby says, that I really can't say what Tart > was responding to.
It's quoted right there below, Steve. All you have to do is scroll down. > But I liked Tart's response. Evidently he was choosing not > to respond directly to something Nabby said No, he was responding directly to what Nabby said. He called it a "wonderful insight," and went right into his shtick as though he were elaborating on what Nabby said. No indication that he was going off on his own tangent. Read it for yourself. , and chose to go off on his own > tangent. One thing to point out. This was something the great Master, > MMY used to do constantly. It was one of his defining characteristics. > > Would you care to comment on Tart's assertion that duality it ultimately > a mirage, and that the true reality is one of unity? Or does he need > follow some dialogue protocal before we can comment on that? > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Yogi <raviyogi@> wrote: > > > > Steve, > > > > Judy is spot on - say you are an enlightened man and are confronting > your child for lying and in walks a retarded tartbrain who says - hey > you enlightened man, you shouldn't be confronting your child for lying > because it's all love bliss, I bet you will smack tartbrain so hard that > his intellectually aroused head will start fitting in his hat for a few > days at least. > > > > > > On Nov 5, 2011, at 8:21 PM, "seventhray1" steve.sundur@ wrote: > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" jstein@ wrote: > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, tartbrain no_reply@ wrote: > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 <no_reply@> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Vaj belives that if a lie is repeated often enough it > > > > > > becomes a truth. Bless his "Buddhist" heart. > > > > > > > > > > That is a wonderful insight. We repeat the lie of separation > > > > > over and over again, over so many years. One day we wake up > > > > > laughing, no longer seeing the lie. The lie is the pathway to > > > > > truth, life is the deepest teacher. We repeatedly bang our > > > > > head against the wall, but that cannot last. The wall banging > > > > > comes to a stop. The lie cannot survive, it just takes some > > > > > intense living of the lie for it to shrivel naturally from > > > > > its own lack of foundation. > > > > > > > > Non sequitur and whopping category error. > > > > > > > > FAIL. > > > > > > > Wow, what a different take. I found Tart's statement to be the best > of the week. It describes the path from ignorance to realization. The > lie of seperation, the truth of unity. The lotus came up from the mud, > so to speak. I suppose Vaj will either back up his statement or choose > to ignore the direct contradictory testimony. But I'll take Tart's > tagent. Hey, that'd be a good name for a blog.
