me too - even though he deviated from my purest intent, I couldn't edit him out.

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bob Price <bobpriced@...> wrote:
>
> 
> 
> Jim,
> 
> You have brought *the manual* to life, as you know a picture is worth more 
> than any words (as I've been trying to tell those yahoos). Keep 'em coming, 
> the blond kid with spiky hair is my fav.  
> 
> 
> ________________________________
> From: whynotnow7 <whynotnow7@...>
> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
> Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2011 3:36:44 PM
> Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: "I'm having an emotion" / the pre-qualification 
> (was.... Bob)
> 
> 
> 
> In the course of examining the etymology of the "King Baby" nomenclature, I 
> sat myself before The Google and searched simply for images of King Baby. 
> What emerged was as startling as it was revealing. 
> 
> With all due diligence, perhaps this can serve as further enrichment and 
> context for the manual now being assembled free of charge in a holiday spirit 
> of selfless giving for none other than the great, the ironically challenged, 
> the supreme King Baby, himself! 
> 
> http://tinyurl.com/6vech2u
> 
> http://tinyurl.com/7x4ay7j
> 
> http://tinyurl.com/7vklwan
> 
> http://tinyurl.com/87bbra6
> 
> http://tinyurl.com/76f2o6k
> 
> http://tinyurl.com/89ak2r4
> 
> http://tinyurl.com/7962wbd
> 
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bob Price <bobpriced@> wrote:
> >
> > Emily,
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Excellent, it's my sincere hope that My Ravi Yogi (much more functional 
> > then My Yahoo) with take time from his busy schedule, stacking all those 
> > books being thrown at him, and provide the much needed input you have 
> > requested. After reading your clarification to the *tender* I reread my PQ, 
> > and sure enough, found two deviations to the scope---desperate for repair:
> > 
> > Should read:
> > 
> > 3. Is every thought, that comes into your head, an *idea*?
> > 
> > 4. Most of the time typing *is* typing and a cigar *is* a cigar?
> > 
> > 
> > Bye bye for now, I need to feed the turkeys, Christmas is just around the 
> > corner.  
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OLBNXdGrD5M
> > 
> > 
> > ________________________________
> > From: Emily Reyn <emilymae.reyn@>
> > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
> > Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2011 2:13:02 AM
> > Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] "I'm having an emotion" / the 
> > pre-qualification (was.... Bob)
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Dear Bob, I think that you may have seen my  follow up post to Barry's 
> > reply and I appreciate you expanding on a scoping process for the 
> > aforementioned "manual project" you've been kicking around.  I see 
> > immediately that it reflects vast and authentic experience on this speck of 
> > dirt we inhabit.  This effort could very well require a "team" of 
> > experts and luckily, the pool of candidates on FFL is colossal.
> > 
> > My initial thoughts?
> > 
> > The title..."I'm having an emotion" - it's very feminazi, wouldn't you say? 
> >  Excellent choice for a working draft.  
> > 
> > I will have to read and reread this scope of work a few more times to fully 
> > grasp its contextual genius (as I am a bit slow) and also pull out my atlas 
> > and encyclopedia. To support my efforts, I want to enlist the help of my 
> > right hand man Ravi and beg him to get me a key points memo.  Of course, 
> > he may reply with "that is the point - there is no point." If this is, in 
> > fact, the case, I will be grateful for the translation and beg him to let 
> > me buy him a pack of smokes and a cup of coffee.  
> > 
> > Fortunately for all, being as overcommitted as I am to the self-centered 
> > idea of claiming my own life, I can only serve in a "hit and miss" advisory 
> > capacity in preparing said manual.  I may be able to provide some 
> > objective or subjective perspective on "feelings" and "emotions" - real or 
> > imagined - doesn't make any difference to me. I feel like I may have some 
> > untapped expertise in the "touchy feely" department.  But, I warn you 
> > that "crying out loud" appears to be my current modus operandi, and it can 
> > get very tiresome.  And yes, my motherly instincts do tend to kick in - 
> > I want to protect all the puppies - another potential downside to any 
> > relevant input.  All in all, all good reasons not to bid.
> > 
> > In my role as complacent strategic advisor, "you have my approval to 
> > proceed." 
> > 
> > I am late this year in lining my marmot hole with grass, so must scurry 
> > amongst the boulders tonight and collect what remains.  
> > 
> > P.S.  Your topic list is an excellent beginning.  MZ, should he 
> > choose to bid, could round it out for you with ease.  Judy could edit it 
> > into something ruthlessly coherent and logical.  You have outed me 
> > though - I have no contributions for two main reasons: 1) I don't pay full 
> > attention to most of KB's posts - probably because my DVD player (the one 
> > attached to my TV that broke) is not hooked up. 2)  I'm still far, far 
> > too frightened to put my neck out there with what might be interpreted as 
> > "accountability" and would prefer to just hug a tree.  
> > 
> > >________________________________
> > > From: Bob Price <bobpriced@>
> > >To: "FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com" <FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com> 
> > >Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2011 11:34 PM
> > >Subject: [FairfieldLife] "I'm having an emotion" / the pre-qualification 
> > >(was.... Bob)
> > > 
> > >
> > >  
> > >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9o58ypeFFWk&feature=related
> > >
> > >Emily, 
> > >
> > >"I'm having an emotion". 
> > >
> > >No, it wasn't KB I heard say that, although you might be forgiven for 
> > >thinking it was. I heard a young woman
> > >say it, some years back, and I'm thinking it would make a great title for 
> > >the
> > >upcoming *feelings* manual we're planning for KB. 
> > >
> > >I'm also thinking; I should not be such a fun hog, and assume I'm the best 
> > >suited to develop the "manual";
> > >as entertaining as it is, winding KB up, like a cheap Chinese watch 
> > >(current
> > >synonym for "pushing buttons", a.k.a. winding up---if you're on the
> > >receiving end, appears to be *rag*), fair is fair, and many of my fellow 
> > >FFL posters
> > >have had the pleasure of receiving Barry's film reviews much longer than I 
> > >have,
> > >and therefore, I believe, the project calls for a *competitive tender*, 
> > >and to
> > >keep things on a professional basis (can't forget: "The Corrupt Practices
> > >Act"), we should begin with a prequalification process.
> > >
> > >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tqoj4zJ3OIs&feature=fvsr
> > >
> > >I fully understand your maternal concern that KB's recent sniveling is 
> > >starting to sound more like
> > >whining, which may soon lead to something that could embarrass all of us; 
> > >so I
> > >promise, the first time I get the urge to change KB to CB I'll stop 
> > >picking on him,
> > >and switch to some engineering stories (I'll include some working titles 
> > >below,
> > >to prove my sincerity). But I must alert you to a potential danger for your
> > >commendable motherly instincts; one of the pitfalls of circular firing 
> > >squads,
> > >like the good KB's, are that they seem to be overly cooperative when you 
> > >ask them
> > >to line up, single file, in a tight formation, and thereby assist yours 
> > >truly in conserving
> > >ammunition. I'm just suggesting you show a little caution if KB asks you 
> > >to stand behind him
> > >(or in front, for that matter); just today I read one of his squad members
> > >inform us that he is 52 (still pondering that factoid), and then threaten 
> > >*My Ravi
> > >Yogi* with some Buddhist thugs (a word the Brits swiped from India) from 
> > >Fox
> > >News, and not to forget today's show stopper from the Menza applicant 
> > >stating
> > >she preferred Madonna to LG, but did not like to watch her dance. 
> > >
> > >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ixljWVyPby0
> > >
> > >For the pre-qualification, which is open to everyone, I propose bidders 
> > >submit ten questions / statements, and/or topics that should
> > >be included in the scope of work of the tender.
> > >
> > >1. When you ask someone if you: "knew them, back in the day", and they 
> > >ignore you, 
> > >
> > >are they trying to tell you something?
> > >
> > >2. If you don't understand irony, should you email one of your shrinking 
> > >circle (circular firing squads will do that
> > >to populations) of FFL friends before embarrassing yourself?
> > >
> > >3. Is every thought that comes into your head is not an *idea*?
> > >
> > >4. When is typing typing or a cigar is a cigar?
> > >
> > >5. Before you state that you're more creative than the author of "In Cold 
> > >Blood" should you check with
> > >someone who has read something more than the "Dharma Bums" to see how
> > >saying that will sound to everyone (except the Madonna lady of course)?
> > >
> > >6. Stop threatening to stop posting on FFL, its OK---we understand, we're 
> > >all you have.
> > >
> > >7. Writing about other people’s creativity is generally not 
> > >considered creative, particularly if
> > >you’re boring the hell out of your audience.
> > >
> > >8. Most people, over eleven, know what's up when someone compulsively 
> > >tailgates rather than engages in
> > >exchanges, for example; when someone mentions psychedelics, don't say you 
> > >met
> > >one of Tim's girl friends (its not the same thing), when someone mentions
> > >flying, don't say you managed it, but got stiffed on the price (makes you 
> > >look
> > >naive), when someone says the speed of light might be different than we 
> > >were
> > >told, don't say you peed on Einstein’s pants 106 years ago (makes 
> > >it look
> > >like you can't count), when someone mentions Hollywood, don't say you 
> > >lived in
> > >Malibu with some screenwriters (makes it look like you're too big a loser 
> > >to
> > >own your own place in Malibu); better to stop typing and notice the 
> > >waitress is
> > >hoping you'll move on.
> > >
> > >9. It's OK to admit you read and reread Judy's emails, to be able to keep 
> > >up with her; nothing to be ashamed
> > >of, having no life is like that.
> > >
> > >10. Rama was the last daddy you'll ever have; if MZ wanted children I'm 
> > >sure he'd aim higher than the
> > >leftovers from a guy who offed himself, rather than face prison. 
> > >
> > >In case this makes him cry, here are the promised working titles:
> > >
> > >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CUKLr5C19Bg&feature=related
> > >
> > >1. Arguing with spiders in Brunei.
> > >
> > >2. Hand gliding a Sharjah storm front; hailstones as big as cantaloupes. 
> > >
> > >3. Kurds, Beirut, and Hollywood squares.
> > >
> > >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BjGpcEA-FyE
> > >
> > >________________________________
> > >From: turquoiseb <no_re...@yahoogroups.com>
> > >To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
> > >Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2011 2:40:07 AM
> > >Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: For Fanboy Robin (Bob)
> > >
> > >--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Emily Reyn <emilymae.reyn@> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> What's goin' on Bob? What are you doing spending your time 
> > >> outwitting KB and Vaj and others that shall not be named? 
> > >
> > >And who obviously don't care what he thinks of them,
> > >if they even bother to read it. :-)
> > >
> > >> We want to hear from you Bob. How's it going from your 
> > >> authentic self. 
> > >
> > >Have you considered the possibility that he has none?
> > >
> > >Think about it. How much do *any* of the folks who seem
> > >to live to rag on me and Vaj and Sal *ever* have to
> > >say, except when they're doing the ragging rag? I guess 
> > >what I'm suggesting is the same thing you seem to be 
> > >suggesting above -- that there is a possibility that 
> > >they don't actually *have* anything to say when they're 
> > >not playing "Gotcha." 
> > >
> > >It's just a suggestion. There is a simple way to prove
> > >it wrong, whether the suggestion comes from me, or from
> > >you, or from anyone else. But that would involve any of 
> > >them saying something new, or original. I'm betting that 
> > >isn't going to happen because the capacity for doing it 
> > >simply isn't there. 
> > >
> > >                         
> > >   
> > >
> > > 
> > >
> > >
> > 
> >  Â 
> >
> 
> 
>   
>


Reply via email to