--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb <no_reply@...> wrote: > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck" <dhamiltony2k5@> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "whynotnow7" <whynotnow7@> wrote: > > > > > > Sounds really good - glad you were able to go. > > > > Yep, I have to thank Raja John Hagelin for granting me an > > exemption to attend the meeting. It was very nice . > turquoiseb <no_reply@...> wrote: (snip) > I have very little interest in hearing what King > Tony has to say to any "easy audience." But I'd > actually be interested to hear what he says to > a "tough audience." No entry requirements. No > badges to be shown. Just people, filing in to > fill the seats and hear how the supposed leader > of a supposedly still-important spiritual move- > ment talks its talk. > > In my not so humble opinion, someone willing to > expose themselves to the public only in situations > in which he gets to predetermine the "loyalty > factor" or "pre-programming" of the audience just > isn't worth listening to. I'm gonna hold out for > those who will talk to anyone...no preconditions, > no expectations. > > But, that said, was there anything *in particular* > he said that resonated with you? You are often > WAY too vague on this forum. Just as I'd like to > see King Tony deal with a real world audience for > once, I'd like to see you get real with us for > once and tell us what still gets you off about > the TM dogma. >
Raja Ram has the balls to face a 'tough audience'. Once saw him in-person in front of, and taking questions from, a non-screened, non-ticketed, non-controlled and highly-educated urban audience. He was totally wonderful with whatever came his way. If not interested in Raja Ram's talk last night, why probe Buck's nascient interest in the talk? How about internally discerning your wasted decade-plus court-side seat with Frederick 'Rama' Lenz, Instead of Incessantly degrading TMers' far less stupid spiritual interests? -Mainstream
